Western Media and Israel: The Definition of Insanity

The definition of insanity…

 Israeli peace

By JAMAL KANJ

WESTERN media is obsessed with presenting a positive spin on everything related to Israel, while trivialising good and accentuating negative news on Palestine.

It’s admirably free in many aspects, but when it comes to discussing Israel the Western media loses its spark. Disingenuous news spin and Israeli pampering are doing peace a great disservice.

In 2003, the Israeli government of Ariel Sharon rejected a road map for peace by adding 14 conditions. Western media downplayed the provisions, emphasising only Sharon’s pretence at approval.

Now, the same media wants the public to believe that Israel’s anti-peace coalition lost seats in the current Israeli election.

At first glance, this may appear speciously accurate. But the media fails to impart that the pro-peace camp did not gain any new support.

While Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may have lost direct party control over some members of the Knesset, this did not translate to a loss for the anti-peace crowd. That’s because the same exact number of seats (11) went to Netanyahu’s former acolyte Naftali Bennett. That means in this election, the Israeli public voted in a far more radical anti-peace coalition. To the right of his former boss, Bennett’s Jewish Home party calls for the annexation of large parts of West Bank.

However, instead of focusing on this the Western media remained sanguine that another new self-proclaimed centrist party, Yesh Atid (There is a Future), won 19 seats. It ignored the fact that in 2009 another perceived centrist party, Kadima, won more seats than Netanyahu’s Likud party – but this hardly mattered. The anti-peace coalition of right wing parties has maintained an overall majority in the Knesset. Meanwhile, Kadima – which ran on a national and pro-peace platform in 2009 – was reduced from 28 seats to just two.

Yesh Atid did well in this election after campaigning on domestic issues and calling for an end to military service exemption for ultra-Orthodox Israelis. Even though the new party received less than 45 per cent of the seats secured by the anti-peace camp, its leader Yair Lapid declared he would not enter the government unless Netanyahu was serious about peace negotiation. In reality, and on issues most critical to Palestinians Lapid’s position does not differ much from the current anti-peace government.

In an article headlined “Lapid’s peace-process doublespeak”, Israeli newspaper Haaretz concluded his party’s platform “does little to distinguish it from the hawkish agendas”. On the subject of occupied East Jerusalem, he believes Israel has “no existence without (East) Jerusalem”. He is so far out of touch that, according to Israeli peace activist Gershon Baski, he thinks by taking firm stand he will “be able to convince the Palestinians to give up Jerusalem”.

Alon Pinkas, former Israeli consul general in New York, accused the new party of being “too vague” on peace negotiations. Sadly, even Lapid’s professed interest in “peace” stems from inhibited racism, a desire to preserve an ethnocentric nation and a wish to avoid living in a country “half Arab, half Jewish”.

Lapid belongs to the same school of deceptive Israeli leaders who claim to support a two-state solution and announce their readiness to make “painful sacrifices”, while impeding Palestinian statehood by building separation walls and illegal “Jewish only” colonies.

The Palestinian leadership must stop waddling. They need to behave like a recognised nation, not an observer of events, and they can’t afford to wait for a new Israeli government to emerge – or until the West recycles another peace plan for the same elusive Zionists.

With an indifferent world community and absence of tangible Arab support, the Palestinian leadership can’t give it another try as “Jewish only” colonies are disintegrating Palestine. It was Albert Einstein who defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It! Digg It!
    www.sajithmr.me

If you liked this article, please consider making a donation to Intifada Palestine by clicking on the following PayPal link. Thank you!

2 Responses to “Western Media and Israel: The Definition of Insanity”

  1. There is only one solution to this ongoing tragedy for whole of mankind….It is speedy dismanteling place called Israel. I support the idea/since Israel is reality/ to change Israels status to : “Israel – Province of Palestine”.
    Ofcource Israels illegal arsenal of WMD must be destroyed, IDF dismateled and UN peace force take charge for security in all territory Palestine / Israel to 67 borders will still remain good achivement for colonial ideology vaged by Zionist on begining of last century/.
    Situacion is becoming truly dangerous for Humanity as unreasonable fanatism on Israels side is closser and closser to horrors mankind never witnessed….
    Israel was most embarising mistake of UN, lets admit it, mankind MUST correct this tragig decision from after WW2 by concentrated efford rework its tragig decision quickly…..peter czech

    [Reply]

    pete Reply:

    Israel was not a mistake by the UN. Truman was threatened by the then jewish lobby that they would push their resources to elect Tom Dewey and it damned near happened. Israel weapons of mass destruction destroyd, you have got to be kidding. Pres. kennedy isisted tehat their nuclear facilities at Dimona be inspected and we all know what happened to him.I would love to see Israel moving back to the 1967 borders but it aint gonna happen.Israel a province of Palestine is a nice thought but not as long as the united states is a province of Israel which it is.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply