4 Responses

  1. Mihail at |

    The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands. This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over all other people.”

    - Le Peuple Juif, February 8, 1919

    [Reply]

    Reply
  2. It is I only at |

    Training deadbeat wannabee punks brainwashed by holywood propaganda! They are all potential, brucie,sylvester & arnie.
    A Assad said! So many of them, where are we going to bury them?

    [Reply]

    Reply
  3. Kathleen Moore at |

    There is a map linked here, it’s a real world planning map completed in October 1941, before Pearl Harbor.

    Download the map, and a gigantic “HEBREWLAND” is drawn in the Middle East occupying vast areas of Palestine.

    The map seems to show the USA acting as a global police force. The map has not received serious academic attention, and it needs it. Much of the world in the past 70 years has been transformed in accordance with this map.

    The wars in the Middle East appear to be designed to sweep away all forms of existing government to implement one or more regional unions. The fact that sections 52, 53 and 54 of the Charter of the UN contemplate the formation of regional unions for security purposes, suggests that events are being synthetically “stimulated” everywhere as a pretext for (a) military intervention and (b) the forced formation of these regional unions seen on the map. The logical question is therefore, how is this map connected to the UN and its plans for world government?

    The first of the unions is the European Union. Two devastating world wars were conducted as the pretext to get that started.

    The 1941 map shows a borderless North America in which Mexico, Central America, Canada, the USA and Greenland are all merged in a single area called United States of America. That union is being advanced today via so-called free-trade agreements, NAFTA, the FTA, CAFTA, and on the “security” pretext of 9/11, through the SPP or “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America”.

    I have more information on 9/11 and the North American Union here:

    http://letsrollforums.com/ace-elevator-did-they-t19811p2.html
    (Scroll down to HCCanada’s post on “Who owned ACE during the WTC work?”

    In effect, the map is being DONE, albeit with small modifications.

    http://the-gomberg-map-of-world-union.blogspot.com/p/about.html

    It deserves very serious, immediate study by political science experts and historians, to determine what sequences of events led to the formation of each of the unions — or “annexations” as in the case of the remains of Yugoslavia. That hatchet job appears to have been instituted by Bush #1, through a 1990 U.S. statute denying any further foreign aid to Yugoslavia unless its federalized components each held independent, multi-party elections. See:

    Citation: Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1991, Pub.L. No. 101-513, 104 Stat. 1979 (1990) [November 5, 1990] [United States Statutes at Large, Volume 104, 101st Congress, 2nd Session (see p. 2063, s. 599A)]

    / TRANSCRIPT:

    PUBLIC LAW 101-513–NOV. 5, 1990 104 STAT. 2063

    [ ... ]

    SEC. 599A. Six months after the date of enactment of this Act, (1)
    none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available pursu-
    ant to this Act shall be obligated or expended to provide any direct
    assistance to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and (2) the Sec-
    retary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive
    Director of each international financial institution to use the voice
    and vote of the United States to oppose any assistance of the
    respective institutions to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: Pro-
    vided, That this section shall not apply to assistance intended to
    support democratic parties or movements, emergency or humani-
    tarian assistance, or the furtherance of human rights: Provided
    further, That this section shall not apply if all six of the individual
    Republics of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia have held free and
    fair multiparty elections and are not engaged in a pattern of system-
    atic gross violations of human rights: Provided further, That not-
    withstanding the failure of the individual Republics of the Socialist
    Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to have held free and fair multiparty
    elections within six months of the enactment of this Act, this section
    shall not apply if the Secretary of State certifies that the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is making significant strides toward complying with the obligations of the Helsinki Accords and is encouraging any Republic which has not held free and fair multiparty elections to do so.

    SEC. 599A. Six months after the date of enactment of this Act, (1) none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available pursuant to this Act shall be obligated or expended to provide any direct assistance to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and (2) the Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director of each international financial institution to use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose any assistance of the respective institutions to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: Provided, That this section shall not apply to assistance intended to support democratic parties or movements, emergency or humanitarian assistance, or the furtherance of human rights: Provided further, That this section shall not apply if all six of the individual Republics of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia have held free and fair multiparty elections and are not engaged in a pattern of systematic gross violations of human rights: Provided further, That notwithstanding the failure of the individual Republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to have held free and fair multiparty elections within six months of the enactment of this Act, this section shall not apply if the Secretary of State certifies that the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is making significant strides toward complying with the obligations of the Helsinki Accords and is encouraging any Republic which has not held free and fair multiparty elections to do so.”

    Download the statute here (140 Megs): http://www.mediafire.com/?swnlxx54b382v5y

    I looked up the USA statute because it’s mentioned in excerpts online from a book by Engdahl:

    “Already in 1988, as it became clear that the Soviet system was on its last legs, Washington had sent in advisers to Yugoslavia from a curious, private, non-profit organization with the high-sounding name, the National Endowment for Democracy, or NED as it was known in Washington circles. That ‘private’ organization began handing out generous doses of dollars in every corner of Yugoslavia, financing opposition groups, buying up hungry young journalists with dreams of a new life, and financing trade union opposition, pro-IMF opposition economists such as the G-17, and human rights NGOs.
    Speaking in Washington in 1998, ten years later, and one year before NATO began bombing Belgrade, NED director Paul McCarthy boasted, ‘NED was one of the few Western organizations, along with the Soros Foundation and some European foundations, to make grants in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and to work with local NGO’s and independent media throughout the country.’ During the cold war, such internal intervention in a foreign country would have been labeled a CIA destabilization. In Washington newspeak, it was called, ‘the fostering of democracy.’ The result, for the living standard of Serbs, Kosovans, Bosnians, Croats and others, was disastrous.
    What ensued in Yugoslavia after 1990 was understood by only a few insiders for what it was. Washington, using the NED, George Soros’s Open Society Foundation and the IMF, introduced economic chaos into Yugoslavia as an instrument of geopolitical policy. In 1989, the IMF demanded that the prime minister, Ante Markovic, impose structural reform on the economy. For whatever reasons, he did.”

    Source: Yugoslavia Gets Shock Therapy, excerpted from the book, A Century of War, Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order by William Engdahl, Pluto Press, 2004, paperback (original edition 1992)

    The key question is, who controls the USA and its foreign policy. I doubt that its people do. One answer, or part of an answer is that the Rhodes Secret Society, also known as the Round Table, controls it with front institutions in London and all the UK’s former colonies, including the CFR in the USA, and the CIC in Canada which backs George Soros and his Open Society Institute, the same one used to undermine Yugoslavia.

    Another part of the answer has to be who controls the Rhodes Secret Society. To keep it short, Cecil’s Rhodes’s banker was a Rothschild, and one of the executors of his will setting up the secret society and the Rhodes Scholarships.

    Another part of the answer is Israel – a project of the Zionist Rothschilds. Or, maybe that should be “HEBREWLAND”; in which case, leftist Roosevelt’s postwar USA has become precisely what the 1941 map calls for: a global military police force… and a highly controlled military proxy for Israel to wage wars of aggression wherever old forms of government must be swept away to be replaced by regional and continental unions… which are apparently all designed on this 1941 map.

    In 1946, speaking to the fledgling UN, Canada’s Louis Stephen Saint Laurent told the UN it was “the basis of the world government”. The tape, in French, has been translated into English and included in a video, here:

    http://www.youtube.com/user/crazyforcanada?feature=mhee#p/u/1/aE6ojYmJLH4

    The destruction of all nations is necessary for the UN to become “the world government”. Bush #1 triggered the destruction of the old Yugoslav federation.

    The remains of Yugoslavia have almost all been annexed to the European Union.

    In this hemisphere, the USA, Canada and Mexico are next; which proves that even the USA itself is a target of attack to terminate it for regional union. And this is being done NOW on the pretext of 9/11, which I and a growing number of others have no doubt was an “inside job” and not simply an outside “terrorist” act.

    I would like to point to a pair of suspects: the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) [a front of the Rhodes group] and the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) [some of whose founding members in Canada are fronts of the same Rhodes group, notably Power Corporation]. Together, they published the post-9/11 2005 plan to regionalize North America — JUST AS SEEN ON THE 1941 MAP — called “Building a North American Community”:

    http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102

    What much of the world may not know is that the USA’s Department of Homeland Security has built a vast network of upwards of 800 CONCENTRATION CAMPS beside vast railway networks on which are parked miles of empty cattle cars. About 2009, there were credible reports of millions of empty rubber coffins being buried in concrete bunkers underground near the rail sites. The coffins had been typically laid out in piles of about half a million per location, before they were inserted into underground cement burial crypts.

    The camps are commonly called “FEMA CAMPS” and you can find evidence of them in YouTube and elsewhere online. The camps were officially recently activated by Obama.

    Therefore, in my view, it is not really the “USA” (meaning the American people) who are conducting all these operations and wars of aggression around the globe, but a sinister cabal of other forces which have seized old governments and taken them over from inside for the purpose of destroying the entire world order of nation-states, while planning the cold-blooded elimination of millions American of citizens on the soil of the USA occupation (some would say “ZOG”) government.

    Kathleen Moore
    HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American Union

    [Reply]

    Reply
  4. Kathleen Moore at |

    CORRECTION:

    cold-blooded elimination of millions of American citizens on the soil of the USA occupation (some would say “ZOG”) government.

    [Reply]

    Reply

Leave a Reply