EXPOSING DEMOCRACY PROMOTION IN THE MIDDLE EAST (تعزيز الديمقراطية الباطل)
06. May, 2011
Print This Article!
1 Comment
Middle East analyst and investigative journalist Maidhc Ó Cathail exposes the Israel partisans, embedded in US governmental and quasi-governmental agencies, that have been involved behind the scenes in encouraging “democratic” reform in the Middle East.
Written by Maidhc Ó Cathail
|
|
|
|
|
 |
If you liked this article, please consider making a donation to Intifada Palestine by clicking on the following PayPal link. Thank you!
Thanks To Maidhc O Cathail for his fine analyst skills and his openness in sharing his findings.
Maidhc perhaps is as right as rain in his assaying of who financed and guided the revolutions in The Magreb abd Middle East and why. Adding to his observations is the reality that while Soros meddling may have led to big blood and bad planing in some instances, in Egypt some reforms are under way, Tunisia is enduring a struggle for poer, Bahrain is meting out horrific injustices to it’s citizens while false rebels in Libya rebel against Gadaffi guided by US clandestine services branch acolyte Hafter and his connections in Libya and with Qatar weapons procurements aided and abetted by the CIA perhaps as well.
Positive and negative results based outcomes of certain aspects of diverse populous and their diverse issues of platforms for revolt coincide with Soros intermediaries efforts and other citizen organisations without ties to Soros but with similar and conflicting ideological underpinnings for their reasons for revolt against in most if not all cases, long intrenched Arab leaders with military, trade, Financial arrangments,political social and cultural affinities to cater to which may not hold the general populous welfare as their highest matter of regard hence the peoples revolts and their predictably destabilising influences in respection nations and their economics.
The flux created by inducing popular revolt is clay in the hands of Soros talented NGO’s and their reletive press relations, trade groups financing and cultural instituions, One aside is the Tsipi Livni front campaign to make rules for new democracies within the framworks of the zionist interconnections of NATO and their respective press blocks and cadres of diplomacy. Note as well the tendency towards hundreth monket syndrome in decrying leaders once relatively popular with their peoples as unfit even to remain citizens, suggesting zionist judgments of Arab leaders and of their peoples reform movements and the sentencing of limited freedoms of change withing restrictive democratic institutional guidelines orchestrated by Soros and practiced well in the colored revolutions as Maidhc avers.
Maidhc stays on point where others often falter relying on his feelings and suspicions and disregarding the temptation to join herd mental slides towards affinity with the winning side so to speak as his sense of how to voice his findings.
AS per the neo-liberal instigators of these revolts so to the neo-liberal aspects of Arab proclivities rises to their occasions of promise . Having spent some brief time studying the ratio of neo liberal thinkers Arab populous and their press blogs and leadership in governance, some room for the Soros model was made by these Arab elements and still exists to bouy the vibrance of revolts in some nations, Syria, while stable, calm and seemingly nationalistic toward Assad at one time hastakn the baits of Soros into it’s gullet setting his hooks in Assad’s regime and reeling him in for ousting, as is seen in Libia, Assad’s support is unready to mount a counter paradigm shift back to affinity with his regime once violence is employed to quash protests. Mubarack made this error, Syria, Bahrain and Yemen Libya is the beginning of NATO involvement and Syria seems to be the next target for intervention of signs read in Libya are applied to the situation now extant in Syria.
Whom else is under the tutelage and employ of Soros, some analysts might ask and find Clintons,Breszinski, Kissinger, David Aaron Miller the Council of Foreign relations, Albright. Sarkozy, Cameron, liberal Israeli knesset and party members and the usual military attaches they abide in and adhere to such as NATO, some nations abstaining but voicing come approval of these revolutions and their opportunistic interventions.
Personally I felt this perhaps as Maidhc did, as happy as the Tunisians and Egyptians were, Bahrain, Yemen and Syria and especially Libya are in deep tumult as to what happens next as flux states of being exist in Egypt and Tunisia, which is a destabilizing effect which pits people power in juxtaposition as aiding and abetting seditious incitements by western powers Soros their kingpin and financier.
What is employed as the sword of neo liberal western powers to their advantage in Arab nations conversely can be used to destabilise western nations with equal effct if not more debilitating given the criteria by which rebellion could be incited , with what apparatus and by whom. The way is made for this reversal of swordplay momentum only if enjoined in earnest with erstwhile and unwavering faith that while this is seditious, it is now sanctioned as within the accepted parameters of modern statecraft as is Soros statement to his interlocutors and assets, were doing this without asking permission, so do we need a ticket for this bus or do we just get on and ride? Lets revolt against Zionist with every weapon we have , all at once, injury to one is injury to all, love is the strongest weapon we have, but not the only weapon we have.
[Reply]