ISRAEL ON IRAN: SO WRONG FOR SO LONG
06. Dec, 2010
Print This Article!
3 Comments
The extremely long history of incorrect Israeli predictions about when Iran will obtain a nuclear bomb
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (AP)
By: Justin Elliott
Officials at the U.S. Department of State, we learned from the secret cables released by WikiLeaks last week, have serious questions about the accuracy — and sincerity — of Israeli predictions about when Iran will obtain a nuclear weapon. As one State official wrote in response to an Israeli general’s November 2009 claim that Iran would have a bomb in one year: “It is unclear if the Israelis firmly believe this or are using worst-case estimates to raise greater urgency from the United States.”
So we thought this was as good a time as any to look at the remarkable history of incorrect Israeli predictions about Iran — especially given that the WikiLeaks trove is being used to argue that an attack on Iran is becoming more likely.
According to various Israeli government predictions over the years, Iran was going to have a bomb by the mid-90s — or 1998, 1999, 2000, 2004, 2005, and finally 2010. More recent Israeli predictions have put that date at 2011 or 2014.
None of this is to say that Iran will not at some point get a nuclear weapon — though the Iranian government has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. That said, Iran has not fully cooperated with international inspectors. But even assuming that Iran is seeking a nuclear weapon, estimates still vary widely on when it will reach that goal.
So what the below timeline should show us is a few things: making accurate predictions about the future is difficult; the Israelis are almost certainly not always offering good-faith assessments of intelligence on Iran; and reporters and the public should demand evidence for assertions about an Iranian nuclear program, whomever the source. Here we go:
October 1992: “Warning the international community that Iran would be armed with a nuclear bomb by 1999, Peres told France 3 television in October 1992 that ‘Iran is the greatest threat [to peace] and greatest problem in the Middle East … because it seeks the nuclear option while holding a highly dangerous stance of extreme religious militantism.’”
Source: Then-Foreign Minister Shimon Peres in an interview with French TV, as described in the book “ Treacherous Alliance .”
November 1992: “But the Israelis caution that a bigger threat to Middle East serenity — not to mention their own country’s security — lies in Teheran, whose regime they say is sure to become a nuclear power in a few years unless stopped.”
Source: New York Times, “Israel Focuses on the Threat Beyond the Arabs — in Iran”
January 1995: “Iran is much closer to producing nuclear weapons than previously thought, and could be less than five years away from having an atomic bomb, several senior American and Israeli officials say.”
Source: New York Times, “Iran May Be Able to Build an Atomic Bomb in 5 Years, U.S. and Israeli Officials Fear”
1995: “The best estimates at this time place Iran between three and five years away from possessing the prerequisites required for the independent production of nuclear weapons.”
Source: Benjamin Netanyahu, in his book “Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat the International Terrorist Network”
February 1996: “On February 15, 1996, Israeli Foreign Minister Ehud Barak told members of the UN Security Council that Iran would be able to produce nuclear weapons within eight years.”
Source: Barak comments reported in “ Treacherous Alliance “
April 1996: “I believe that in four years they [Iran] may reach nuclear weapons,” [Israeli Prime Minister Shimon] Peres told ABC television during an interview.
Source: Agence France Presse, “Iran could have nuclear weapons in four years: Peres” (via Nexis)
November 1999: “Unless the United States pressures Russia to end its military assistance to Iran, the Islamic republic will possess a nuclear capability within five years, a senior Israeli military official said Sunday.”
Source: Associated Press, “Israeli official: U.S. must pressure Russia to end military cooperation with Iran” (via Nexis)
July 2001: “‘I mentioned to our friends, the Turkish leadership, that we are more than worried about the very rapid development taking place regarding nuclear weapons,’ [Minister of Defense] Binyamin Ben-Eliezer told reporters. ‘As far as we know by the year 2005 they [Iran] will, they might, be ready.’”
Source: Associated Press, “Israeli defense minister: Iran could have nuclear weapons by 2005″ (via Nexis)
August 2003: “Iran will have the materials needed to make a nuclear bomb by 2004 and will have an operative nuclear weapons program by 2005, a high-ranking military officer told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Monday.”
Source: Jerusalem Post, “Iran can produce nuclear bomb by 2005 – IDF”
February 2009: “Netanyahu said he did not know for certain how close Iran was to developing a nuclear weapons capability, but that ‘our experts’ say Iran was probably only one or two years away and that was why they wanted open ended negotiations.”
Source: Then-candidate for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in conversation with an American congressional delegation, as described in a cable released by WikiLeaks
June 2009: Barak estimated a window between 6 and 18 months from now in which stopping Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons might still be viable.
Source: Defense Minister Ehud Barak in conversation with members of Congress, as described in a cable released by WikiLeaks
June 2009: “Unless their programme experiences technical problems, the Iranians will have by 2014 a bomb ready to be used, which would represent a concrete threat for Israel,” said [Mossad chief] Meir Dagan.
Source: Agence France Press, “Iran will have nuclear bomb by 2014: Mossad”
November 2009: “General Baidatz argued that it would take Iran one year to obtain a nuclear weapon and two and a half years to build an arsenal of three weapons.”
Source: Brigadier General Yossi Baidatz, an Israeli military intelligence official, in conversation with an American defense official, as described in a WikiLeaks cable.
September 2010: “The reasoning offered by Israeli decision makers was uncomplicated: Iran is, at most, one to three years away from having a breakout nuclear capability (often understood to be the capacity to assemble more than one missile-ready nuclear device within about three months of deciding to do so).”
Source: Jeffrey Goldberg, reporting the Israeli point of view in a cover story on Iran in the Atlantic
Justin Elliott is a Salon reporter. Reach him by email at jelliott@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin More: Justin Elliott
|
|
|
|
|
 |
If you liked this article, please consider making a donation to Intifada Palestine by clicking on the following PayPal link. Thank you!
Why doesn’t the P.M. of Iran say to Israel, bibi, lets make nice you show me your & i will show you mine. Israel won,t let Anybody see their weaponry. Remember what happened to Pres. Kennedy when he demanded to see Israel,s arsenal in Dimona. they want everybody to be open but that doesn’t include them. Every other nation has signed a non-nuclear proliferation treaty, but Israel. I would be willing to bet that Iran would probably say go ahead & inspect for weapons of mass destruction & then let us inspect yours. You know what the answer would be. I remember our last president,Alfred E Newman saying he don’t want to see a mushroom cloud so let attack IRAQ. Now Saddam Hussein wasn’t that stupid, he knew if he would try to nuke us his regime & land would have been obliterated in minutes. If he really wanted to harm the U.S. bad enough, & i am sure he did he could have had his agents drop botulism into the great lakes or waters supply systems in the U.S. Those jerks in Washington must think we are all low watt bulbs. Which i am beginning to think we are,seeing nobody dares to stand up to Nazi- Israel. I do not want to see my 2 grandsons killed in a war for Israel. To defend our country is another matter although i still would not want to see them harmed.
[Reply]
I was a U.S. NRC nuke inspector for 19 years, and was an International Atomic Energy Inspector for 3 years, and I can assure anyone that whatever supposed non-cooperation that the IAEA alleges against Iran is minimal if not totally irrelevant when one considers that each year there are a few IAEA agreement states that willfully do not comply with the IAEA. For examples of non-compliance: refusal to provide inspectors with samples of nuclear material for IAEA lab verification, such as nuke submarine fuel that countries deem proprietary or national security secret info; willfully delaying inspectors at airports for bogus customs reasons; clandestine nuclear experiments on enrichment, fissile material metallurgy, etc.; and in North Korea’s case detonating a test nuclear weapon as recently as 2009; in Saudi Arabia’s casae funding illegal Iraqi and Pakistani nuclear weapons programs. The biggest menace to the global non=proliferation regime has been Israel, which among other violations of international law, provided nuclear weapons technology and assistance to South Africa during the apartheid area in violation of UN sanctions. AS FOR IRAN AND THE IAEA, Iran has gone far beyond the legal requirements in cooperating with IAEA, for example voluntarily accepting more stringent inspections and allowing IAEA teams to fly around Iran to find the ‘slam dunk’ evidence of an illegal nuclear weapons-related sites (which I should add this ‘evidence’ was provided by US intelligence agencies and the trip I refer to was in the 1990s, and result was nil. LASTLY, based on my interactions with Iranians working at the IAEA, of all the various naionalities the Iranians were the best ones to work with wrt competence and dedication to the IAEA mission. America was the worst nation by contrast, for example attempting to coopt the independent policy decisions of former Director General Mohammed el-Baradi, voting annually against designating the Middle East as a nuclear weapons free zone, leaking internal IAEA documents to the media, and the sordid list could go on. Lastly, the US puts itself in an inane ‘Catch-22′ dichotomy in that the US official policy states that the IAEA is a vital cornerstone of the global non-proliferation regime, and the US provides 30% of IAEA funds, yet the US routinely second-guesses and even contravenes IAEA inspecton results which do not fit with US political needs.
[Reply]
pete Reply:
December 8th, 2010 at 6:53 pm
Thats different,what we &Israel do, is good, what others do is bad.
[Reply]