Critiques of Uri Avnery's Opposition to Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions

By: Jeff Blankfort

Hoping against Hope By: Ben Heine

www.zope.gush-shalom.org

Hello Uri,

I have just read your response to critics of your opposition to boycotting Israel and, having long ago realized the limits of your activism and worldview, it held no surprises. You have quite clearly invested too much time and energy over the years in rationalizing Israel’s dispossession of the Palestinians from their homeland to acknowledge the injustice that was not only inherent but required for Israel’s creation. The passage of time does not erase that injustice no matter how many times you or others invoke the the Nazi holocaust. The die for establishing a Jewish state displacing the Palestinians from their homes and villages was cast well before Hitler came to power so that issue should have no place in this argument.

The arguments against establishing a Jewish state in Palestine raised by anti-Zionist and non-Zionist Jews going back to the early years of the last century were well known and all have been proved correct. So it should not be a matter of surprise that Israel’s legitimacy has not been accepted by the Palestinians and the other peoples of the region. It was advertised by Zionists worldwide as a colonial settler enterprise with pride, in fact, until such terminology fell out of favor. That it was established at a time when the rest of the world was engaged in a period of decolonization was even a further guarantee of its rejection and had it not been for the influence of its supporters in the US and Europe and the arms that flowed from that support, Israel, like French Algeria, would have become  another episode in history. (And it is noteworthy that it was Israel’s support for the French against the Algerian resistance that led to France being Israel’s chief supplier of weaponry until 1967).

You are also well aware that to maintain Israel as the Sparta of the Middle East, the  ”Pro-Israel Lobby,” has long held the US Congress in thrall, strangling what little is left of American democracy. Do you not recall writing how one president after another tried to resolve the Israel-Palestine conflict and how each one was forced by The Lobby to retire from the field defeated? And with each defeat, the theft of Palestinian land and the growth of the settlements continued. Who has paid the price for that?

As you have already assumed, I am against the existence of the state of Israel or a Jewish state by any other name which is based on the notion that a Jew from anywhere in the world has more of a right to live in what most of the world knew and accepted as Palestine than a Palestinian Arab who was born there or her or his family members. If that is not both immoral and racist, we need new definitions for those words. And yet you, apparently, do not find it so, and reject the opinions of those who do. (The notion that Israel or any country can be a homeland for a person not born there and who cannot trace a single relative that was born there is but another example of how  Zionists have twisted the language to justify the unjust.)

Your desperation for an argument against the idea of a single state becomes apparent when you write that the French and the Germans did not agree to live together. Do you really believe there is any comparison to be made between the two situations.  Are the French sitting on German land or vice versa?

I continue to be mystified at your continuing efforts to separate the settlers from those Jews living within the Green Line as if the majority of those in Israel proper are not as responsible for electing a series of professional killers as their prime ministers year after year, all of whom have expanded the settlements. There hasn’t been a single poll of Israeli Jews that I have seen going back to 1988, in the early days of the first intifada, where half of those polled did not call for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza. How many settlers were there in 1988?

In your wonderful democracy, every able bodied Jewish man or woman, with the exception of the chassdim, has served as an occupier in the West Bank or Gaza for the past 42 years. Are they not culpable? Yesterday, I watched on Al-Jazeera as Israeli soldiers fired waves of tear gas and some smelly green liquid on non-violent Palestinians who were marching to demonstrate the steel fence that cuts through their land at Ni’ilin and who then began targeting the Al-Jazeera reporter. Are we expected to embrace these young thugs wearing an Israeli uniform? Are those who hate them to be condemned and not the thugs and those who sent them there?

You repeatedly use the word, peace, but not once do you use the word “justice.” And that is what separates you and your fellow Zionists from the Palestinians and those who genuinely support them. The occupation bothers your conscience, your sense of identity as an Israeli but how much does it affect your life? Ending the occupation no matter how it is arranged will bring you peace of mind and time to finish your memoirs. Now, try if you can, and imagine yourself as a Palestinian who has been under an Israeli jackboot all of his or her life. Would you be simply looking for peace, an absence of that Israeli jackboot, or would you be seeking and demanding justice?

Your conclusion expresses your confusion. You write that you want “Israel to be a state belonging to all its citizens, without distinction of ethnic origin, gender, religion or language; with completely equal rights for all,” yet you assume there will be a “Hebrew-speaking majority” that will allow its “Arab-speaking citizens…to cherish their close ties with their Palestinian brothers and sisters…” If there is no distinction between one citizen and another, Jewish or Arab, how can you assume that the majority will continue to be Hebrew-speaking (or are you allowing for the possibility that Israel’s Palestinian Arab population which already is largely bi-lingual will become the majority at which point Israel will no  longer be a Jewish state?) If that is so, perhaps there is hope for you yet.

Jeffrey Blankfort

Jeffrey Blankfort

Jeffrey Blankfort: A former editor of the Middle East Labor Bulletin, long-time photographer, and has written extensively on the Israel-Palestine conflict. He also hosts a program on international affairs for KZYX, the public radio station of Mendocino County, California. He can be reached at: jblankfort@earthlink.net.

================

Dear Uri –

By: Jeff Gates

Thank you for your thoughtful reflection on the recent visit of Archbishop Tutu and your assessment of the impact of the boycott: Tutu’s Prayer.

I write to caution you in the reliance you put on Barack Obama whose political career in Illinois is a product of the West Side (Ashkenazi) Chicago Outfit dating from organized crime of the 1920s — as you’ll see in Chapter 8 of Guilt By Association, the first release in the Criminal State series.

To assess the narrow parameters within which this latest U.S. president operates, I ask that you review the following recent op-eds (and consider posting them as well).

Note in each op-ed how those chronicled in Guilt by Association focus their efforts on the key “in between” domains (i.e., in between the U.S. populace and the unbiased facts required for informed choice), particularly media—though also including think tanks, pop culture, academia and politics.

Thus the capacity of these extremists to displace facts with what “the mark” was deceived to believe regarding Iraqi WMD, Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda, Iraqi meetings in Prague, Iraqi purchases of uranium from Niger, Iraqi’s mobile biological weapons laboratories, etc. All false yet all widely believed. Indeed, a “consensus” was created that induced us to war in the Middle East, all consistent with the goals of Greater Israel. Thus my concern about your beliefs regarding the performance of Barack Obama given his background and his performance to date. The fact that others share your beliefs makes them all the more alluring—and all the more dangerous due to their “consensus” appeal.

While I understand how — particularly living in Israel — you may sincerely believe that he is able to make a clean break from Christian-Zionist G.W. Bush, the reality is very different. You will find on www.criminalstate.com many commentaries chronicling HOW this deception proceeds in plain sight. Let me offer just a few examples to illustrate the point that your faith in this latest Oval Office occupant is fully understandable—even admirable—yet insupportable based on his history and present-day facts:

Consider the ADL Model Hate Crime legislation (now pending in conference) that Obama has said he will sign (note the role of the Frankfurt School from the 1920s):

http://intifada-palestine.com/2009/08/03/the-adls-hate-crimes-legislation/

This transnational network, in practical effect, took control of the Congress and the Executive Branch. Thus his inability to govern consistent with the principles of a place-based democratic government (vs. diaspora-based). Note how the math of this virtual takeover is apparent but who in the U.S. media would report it to “the mark”?:

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7&section=0&article=124829&d=24&m=7&y=2009

This syndicate (and it is that) works transnationally—as with Haim Saban helping elect Angela Merkel and then moving immediately to dominate Hispanic media (Univision), the fastest-growing voting bloc in the U.S. When you grasp the systemic nature of this influence, it becomes clear how this fact-displacing modus operandi can operate (and coordinate) across borders and on a genuinely global scale:

http://intifada-palestine.com/2009/08/06/anti-zionists-the-new-heretics/

Here’s the latest assessment of the behavior of this latest political product of the Chicago Outfit. Note the role of media in the pre/post-Cairo framing — with the (fully foreseeable) assistance of those stage-managing “our” latest presidency.

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2009/08/27/appeasing-israel-at-what-cost

I hope this helps you grasp why those “in the know” take exception to such rosy scenario assessments of this latest commander in chief. The only modern component of this ancient craft is the technological means to deceive on a global scale.

Best regards,

Jeff Gates

Jeff Gates

Jeff Gates: A widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment banker, educator and consultant to government, corporate and union leaders worldwide, Jeff Gates’ latest book is Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008). His previous books include Democracy at Risk: Rescuing Main Street From Wall Street and The Ownership Solution: Toward a Shared Capitalism for the 21st Century. For two decades, an adviser to policy-makers worldwide. Counsel to the U.S. Senate Finance Committee (1980-87).

For more: www.criminalstate.com

And More:

Abraham Simhony’s Letter to Uri

Ran Greenstein’s comments on Uri Avnery’s opposition to the BDS Movement

Alan Sabrosky’s CONTRA AVNERY: A Case for Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions (BDS)

Helena Cobban’s BDS: Avnery’s Dangerous Argumentation

Anis Hamadeh’s The Other News – Avnery vs. Gordon on Boycotting

Kim Petersen’s Boycotts as a Legitimate Means of Resistance As Determined by the Oppressed people

If you liked this article, please consider making a donation to Intifada Palestine by clicking on the following PayPal link. Thank you!